Weblog

Tuesday, 13 November 2007

Wednesday, 10 October 2007

Tuesday, 25 September 2007

  • Phil 366-Essay

    6-8pp, due Oct. 4
    Cartesian Dualism and its Critics

    In your paper, provide a short characterization of the dualistic view of the mind and mental processes which Descartes defends in the Meditations, and address the following questions:

    What arguments does Descartes explicitly advance in support of his view? Do they work? If not, why not? Are there other arguments (perhaps implicit in Heil's discussion of dualism in Ch.2) that might be more effective?

    What positive considerations seem to count against Cartesian dualism? Of these, which do you find the most forceful and why? What makes the others less so? Are there responses to these criticisms available to Descartes? If not, can these criticisms be adequately addressed by modifying Descartes' dualism in some way while still retaining the core of his position? Or do these criticism seem to overthrow dualism altogether?

    In your paper, try to give evidence of having understood the various concepts, distinctions, doctrines, arguments, etc., that have figured prominently in readings, lectures, and discussion.

    Additionally, please be sure to do the following:

    1) Furnish an appropriate title for your paper.
    2) Cite the relevant pages when you paraphrase or quote.
    3) Provide an introductory paragraph in which you 1) announce your topic, 22) convey its importance, and 3) state the thesis you will defend.
    4) Provide a concluding paragraph in which you re-iterate the thesis you have argued for.
    5) Edit your paper: That means you should subject your first-draft to a round of substantial revision of content, organization, grammar, and style.
    6) Proofread your paper: That means you should read through your paper after you print it out to make sure you have left no typographical errors, etc.

    In writing your paper, you should aim for clarity and precision of expression. Bear in mind also that your paper will be assessed, not on what position you take, but on how well you argue whatever position you choose to defend.

Friday, 13 July 2007

Top Tags - Weblog

[no tags]